Utilitarianism sometimes involves the sacrifice of an individual’s happiness or life in order to promote the greatest amount of happiness and the least amount of misery (Bennett 71). Kantian Moral Theory I agree with Kantian moral theory instead of utilitarianism because I find Kantian reasoning to be more agreeable than utilitarianism. Our next stop in our tour of the ethical lay of the land is utilitarianism. Emmanuel Kant, advocating absolutism, and John Stuart Mill, who supports utilitarianism, represent two of the most prominent theories. However, these two philosophies take on different standpoints on ethics. We do not, and may never, know just what particular rules would maximize expected aggregate utility, and the relevant Kantian perspective is not a fully determinate decision procedure. Those who are not students of philosophy, words like utilitarianism and Kantianism may sound alien, but for those who try to tackle questions of ethics and wisdom, these two represent important viewpoints. • Attitude towards what is right or wrong is what constitutes the basic difference between utilitarianism and Kantianism. Utilitarianism is a consaquentalist theory which states that the morality is based upon the outcome whereas kant bases his theory on the intention (duty) kant disregards emotion , wheras Peter singer would claim that preference which are a part of emotion play a big part of morality decision making etc Thus, this is the fundamental difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism. 1761 Words 8 Pages. 2. However, these two diverge in their focus. In regards to Mill, there are situations where sometimes quantity overrules. The theories also differ when you begin to look at Kant's second categorical imperative, which states that one should treat humanity always as an end and never as a means only. @media (max-width: 1171px) { .sidead300 { margin-left: -20px; } } According to him, the morality of an action is not based on its consequences. Hence, this theory belongs to deontological moral theories. 2009, Available here. “Kantianism.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 10 Mar. 5. “California State University Sacramento, Available here. Show More. Thus, this theory is identified as encouraging the compromise of individual interest while also focusing on promoting a greater sense of common good in society. Deontology or deontological theories are those that focus on ethics involving responsibility, moral duty, and commitment. This is a philosophy put forward by Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher who was born in Prussia. The main difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism is that Kantianism is a deontological moral theory whereas utilitarianism is a teleological moral theory. Kant described that duty, goodwill, and moral worth are vital to determine the morality of an action. There are two classical types of utilitarianism, which are act and rule utilitarianism. Kant Vs Utilitarian Theory 1111 Words | 5 Pages According to Kant, a purely good act is performed due to the person’s obligation to the categorical imperative. Immanuel Kant is a firm believer that every person has…show more content… Utilitarian’s believe that under certain circumstances an abortion could be justified. 37 An Introduction to Western Ethical Thought: Aristotle, Kant, Utilitarianism . Essay text: He names this moral action a ‘duty.’ Kant also believes that in determining the moral worth of an action, we need to look at the maxim by which it was performed. “Kantianism > Utilitarianism.” Postcolonial Studies, Curbside Consult, Available here. Unlike Utilitarianism, Kant's ethical system represents a universal categorical imperative rule of ethics. Moreover, Kantianism is postulated by Immanuel Kant while Utilitarianism is postulated by Jeremy Bentham, John Sturt Mill, Henry Sidgwick, et al. I believe the lives of all are valuable but generally speaking, the loss of … Mill is one of the philosophers who described the moral theory of utilitarianism, an ethical view that can help an individual in making decisions. Utilitarianism is an ethical philosophy introduced by pioneering figures such as Jeremy Bentham (introduced the classical utilitarianism), John Stuart Mill, Henry Sidgwick, and G.E Moore. that emphasizes that the morality of an action/decision as determined by its consequences. One principle lies at the heart of both utilitarianism and absolutism. Thus, this article looks at this difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism. “947574” (CC0) via Pixabay. Both Kantianism and utilitarianism are ethical theories that express the ethical standard of an action. Hence, this philosophy is based on the principle of hedonism and consequentialism, which means the right action is defined entirely in terms of the consequences produced. Kantianism and Utilitarianism are ethical philosophies that give moral guidance to individual actions and decisions. However, according to utilitarianism, an action is considered moral and good if it results in providing greater happiness for others, regardless of its intention; hence an action is measured by its consequences. Title: Kant Vs. Utilitarianism. The imperative is the correct, right, or good action taken in a particular situation. Pecorino, Philip A. Kantianism is the ethical theory put forward by the German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) in the 18th century. 3. Utilitarianism Vs Kant. The worth of any human action depends upon its utility or value. Coming from Engineering cum Human Resource Development background, has over 10 years experience in content developmet and management. There is hardly any similarity between utilitarianism and Kantianism. Author: Jessica F. Date: December 8, 2015. What are the Similarities Between Kantianism and Utilitarianism      – Outline of Common Features 4. What is the Difference Between Kantianism and Utilitarianism, What are the Similarities Between Kantianism and Utilitarianism, What is the Difference Between Kantianism and Utilitarianism. There are two classical types of utilitarianism, which are act and rule utilitarianism. This is a philosophy that believes that consequences of an action are responsible for people judging that action as morally right or wrong. “John Stuart Mill by London Stereoscopic Company, c1870” By London Stereoscopic Company – Hulton Archive (Public Domain) via Commons Wikimedia3. Essay Details: Subject: Philosophy. “Kantianism.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 26 Sept. 2018, Available here. Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism According to Thiroux and Krasemann (2012), utilitarianism is, “a normative ethical theory originally established by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill that advocates brining about good consequences or happiness to all concerned” (pp. What is Kantianism      – Definition, Theory, Characteristics  2. Please enable Javascript and refresh the page to continue Kantianism … 6. This philosophy focuses on duty which is why it is termed deontological that comes from Greek obligation or duty. The main difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism is that Kantianism is a deontological moral theory whereas utilitarianism is a teleological moral theory. Level: Grade: A. Moreover, there are two branches on utilitarianism as an act and rule utilitarianism. Kant vs. Utilitarianism One of the best ways to understand an ethical theory is to understand an opposing theory… The underlying idea behind Kantian ethics is that each human being has inherent worth. Kant discusses that the mentioned human reason should be devoid of the influence of desires or emotions. It is easier to determine an action as morally right in Kantian ethics than in utilitarian ethics. 1. Kant’s Groundworks of the Metaphysics of Morals and Mill’s Utilitarianism present morality from two vastly different perspectives. “Kantian Ethics. “The History of Utilitarianism.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, 27 Mar. 1. Her academic interests are English language, European and Oriental Languages, Internal Affairs and International Politics, and Psychology. Utilitarianism is based on the principle of utility, which emphasizes on the idea of being more useful and beneficial for a majority. Utilitarianism has its benefits but requires much more effort to do than Kant’s ethics. • Utilitarianism says that an act is justified if maximum numbers of people are deriving happiness out of … Act utilitarianism is right only if the result of good is just as much or more than any other available substitute. In this regard, the consequences of actions are unimportant as free from special pleading good will leads to well reasoning only. 1. Thus, under utilitarianism, the morally correct decision/action is what produces greater pleasure or happiness for the doer as well as for others. Kantianism … Utilitarianism vs Deontology . The ethical systems of Kant and Mill: A comparison and contrast Ricardo Renta Pages: 9 (2158 words) Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism Pages: 4 (894 words) Kants Ethics vs Utilitarianism Pages: 3 (686 words) The Ethics of Abortion: Utilitarianism, Buddhism & Kant. Length: 4 / 1052. Terms of Use and Privacy Policy: Legal. Moreover, he further explained that humans, being rational beings, should use their reasoning ability or rational thinking when making ethical decisions. The main difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism is that Kantianism is a deontological theory while utilitarianism is a teleological theory. Doing the right thing means to follow proper rules of behavior and, by doing so, promoting fairness and equality. DEONTOLOGY vs UTILITARIANISM The theory of deontology is derived from the writings of German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). have to be prohibited even though sometimes such actions will also result in more happiness than other alternatives. “Immanuel Kant 3” By “Masters of Achievement” text (Public Domain) via Commons Wikimedia2. There are many similarities between utilitarianism and Kantianism that confuse some people. And that an act is justified if the end result is happiness for all. Utilitarianism vs. Kant Through the readings we have done and in class, we have discussed the moral status of many different actions using the guidelines of different moral theories. What is Utilitarianism      – Definition, Theory, Characteristics 3. • Utilitarianism says that an act is justified if maximum numbers of people are deriving happiness out of it. 451). They both give us fundamental and universal theories pertaining to morality. On the other hand, Kant’s duty ethics is concerned only by acts and their motives. The believers of this philosophy take the position that the morality of an action is dependent upon whether the individual has adhered to the rules or not. Heather Wilburn. Talking about this part, we have to pay some attention to core values of two analyzed ethics approaches. Whatever we do inside our obligations is morally good. Hence, this is another difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism According to Thiroux and Krasemann (2012), utilitarianism is, “a normative ethical theory originally established by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill that advocates brining about good consequences or happiness to all concerned” (pp. Kant postulated this theory to give ethical guidelines to people when making ethical decisions or actions. This simply means that the end justifies means. 451). Difference Between Ethnic Cleansing and Genocide, Difference Between First Name and Last Name, Difference Between Libertarian and Anarchist, Difference Between Coronavirus and Cold Symptoms, Difference Between Coronavirus and Influenza, Difference Between Coronavirus and Covid 19, Difference Between Marginal Costing and Differential Costing, Difference Between N Glycosylation and O Glycosylation, Difference Between Epoxy and Fiberglass Resin, Difference Between Baricitinib Tofacitinib and Upadacitinib, Difference Between Galvanizing and Tinning. Thus, he described that a person will be engaging in morally good decisions/actions when he is guided and motivated only by goodwill and duty. The Utilitarianism is driven by the intention to reach some outcome, which will be displayed by beneficial consequences to the largest number of people: happiness, pleasure, profits etc. Accordingly, even if the intention of the action/decision is not moral, if that particular action results in providing greater happiness for others, then it is ethical and morally right under utilitarianism. Both are ethical philosophies that focus on describing the morality of an action or a decision. Upen, BA (Honours) in Languages and Linguistics, has academic experiences and knowledge on international relations and politics. According to Kantianism, action should be motivated by goodwill and duty and the morality of an action is not measured by its consequences. Pages: 9 (2021 words) Utilitarianism states that what makes an action right is that it produces the greatest amount of happiness (not just your happiness, but others as well). Utilitarianism requires too much concentration on individual aspects of what the greatest happiness is and basing moral standards around them. While there are many approaches to ethics in the west, here we will look at three distinct theories. The main difference between virtue ethics utilitarianism is that virtue ethics focuses on the person carrying out an action, whereas utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of the action.. Virtue ethics and utilitarianism are moral and ethical theories that have the ability to determine the rightness or wrongness of an action. On the other hand, Kant postulated his theory, Kantianism that offers ethical guidelines that help people in making ethical decisions. Both Kant and Mill provide noble visions of morality, and center their thoughts on respectable principles that focus the rest of their works. More importantly, he emphasized that duty should be the fundamental aspect one should consider when doing an action. • Lying is universally wrong and thus it is wrong in Kantianism too. Filed Under: People Tagged With: Kant, Kantianism, Utilitarianism. In other words, if more people benefit from a particular action or decision, then it is considered ethical. Those who are followers of Kantianism say that this approach does not take into account the good of the minorities. Vleeschauwer, Herman Jean de. These are associated with morality. Accordingly, the main difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism is that Kantianism is a deontological moral theory whereas utilitarianism is a teleological moral theory. Utilitarianism is considered one of the most powerful approaches to normative ethics in philosophy. Both Kantianism and utilitarianism are ethical theories that express the ethical standard of an action. Kant believed that good will was the only thing truly good that could be used to determine a person’s morality. The Categorical imperative is an expression of the moral law. Though people tend to consider the two terms Utilitarianism and Deontology as similar, there are certain differences between the two terms. Deontological ethics is an ethics system that judges whether an action is right or wrong based on a moral code. However, for the Kantian theory, it is believed that human reason is the only pure good, and they disregard the consequences. The theory says that people choose actions that help in maximizing happiness and at the same time remove misery, pain and agony. However, these two philosophies take on different standpoints on ethics. All rights reserved. “Chapter 8: Ethics; UTILITARIANISM .” What Is Philosophy?, Available here. Driver, Julia. Deontology v. Utilitarianism: Deontology is an argument for moral principles that are found using reason and was best articulated by Immanuel Kant. Both of these theories were introduced during the 18th century. However, under utilitarianism, lying is OK if it brings pleasure and happiness to most of the people. 2016, Available here. However, there are important differences between the two philosophies that will be outlined in this article. The foundation of Kant’s moral philosophy lies on deontology, or the logic of duty, in opposition to utilitarianism, which favors useful acts over dutiful ones. In fact, they are two different schools of thought regarding morality. This chapter compares and contrasts rule-utilitarian and Kantian thinking about what moral rules should be accepted and what exceptions they should allow. Likewise, Kant described two fundamental questions to consider when one is doing any action: The main reason for Kant to not consider the consequences of actions when determining its morality is that he believed that actions such as theft, lying, murder, crimes etc. Home » Public » People » Philosophy » What is the Difference Between Kantianism and Utilitarianism. Immanuel Kant, the ethics systems celebrated proponent, formulated the most influential form of a secular deontological moral theory in 1788. Also, this theory was developed as a result of an attempt to direct the lawmakers of England to consider the common good rather than the welfare of their social class when formulating laws. Kantian moral theory believes that in order for people to act morally, people’s actions need to follow consistency, reasons, and fairness (Shafer- … Kantianism vs Utilitarianism • Attitude towards what is right or wrong is what constitutes the basic difference between utilitarianism and Kantianism. Thus, a believer of utilitarianism would say that the outcomes of an action that is deemed morally right would be good. utilitarianism have made clear,22 any possible utilitarianism is some combination of (i) a doctrine of the end-state to be realized, that is, a condition or state of affairs deemed to have Utilitarianism is that the goodness or rightness of an ethic in question, depends on the desirability of its consequences. Compare the Difference Between Similar Terms. Utilitarianism makes ethical decisions based on the results that the action will cause. Consequences of those actions are not taken into consideration. Aristotle’s approach is agent-centered in that it focuses on the development of the individual, which in turn, benefits society as a whole. Difference Between Positivism and Realism, What is the Difference Between Chia and Basil Seeds, What is the Difference Between Soy and Paraffin Wax, What is the Difference Between Red and White Miso, What is the Difference Between Bamboo and Cotton Sheets, What is the Difference Between Nylon and Polyester Carpet, What is the Difference Between Running Shoes and Gym Shoes, Kantianism and Utilitarianism were introduced during the 18. Unlike religious deontological … (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Copyright © 2010-2018 Difference Between. Simply because you are a human, you have worth in and of yourself. I will be focusing on just two of the theories that we’ve covered: the Kantian perspective and the Utilitarian perspective. From a utilitarian perspective, it is moral to kill one person to save five because five lives are worth more than one, generally speaking. • Modern democracies are all about utilitarianism as they aim to bring the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest number of people. This ethics system is intended to be precise and by the book. • On the other hand, Kantianism says that the end does not justify means. Act utilitarianism is right only if the result of good is just as much or more than any other available substitute. 4. Utilitarianism has its benefits but requires much more effort to do than Kant’s ethics. Moreover, utilitarianism considers the ethical good of a decision or action by locating its moral goodness in the feelings of humans in order to generate greater happiness and pleasure on the majority. Therefore, it is the consequences of these actions that should be considered when determining the morality of the actions. Kantianism is a moral philosophy introduced by Immanuel Kant that emphasizes that morality of an action/decision is not determined by its consequences but by the motivation of the doer whereas Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy introduced by Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Henry Sidgwick, etc. Kant stated that a universal law should provide the basis for each act, and that the intention was of more importance than the result. On the contrary, utilitarianism states that a good ethical decision is gauged by the amount of pleasure that the act In my opinion, both Mill’s utilitarianism theory and Kant’s theory of deontology can be superior depending on the situation. • If we do not talk about means, both utilitarianism as well as Kantianism seek good results in life for people. Accordingly, Kantianism is considered the opposite philosophy of Utilitarianism. What is the Difference Between Kantianism and Utilitarianism       – Comparison of Key Differences, Ethics, Morals, Kantianism, Utilitarianism, Theories, Philosophy. F. Date: December 8, 2015 the influence of desires or emotions as! Jessica F. Date: December 8, 2015 quantity overrules universal categorical is. Wikimedia Foundation, 26 Sept. 2018, Available here, under utilitarianism, are. Principles that are found using reason and was best articulated by Immanuel Kant ( 1724-1804 ) in the west here. Any similarity between utilitarianism and Kantianism put forward by the book Attitude towards what utilitarianism. By its consequences not taken into consideration the greatest number of people are deriving out. And moral worth are vital to determine the morality of an action is. Are unimportant as free from special pleading good will was the only pure good, and center their thoughts respectable... Emmanuel Kant, utilitarianism. ” what is right or wrong and at the heart of both utilitarianism and.. Of those actions are not taken into consideration life for people judging action... That Kantianism is considered ethical give moral guidance to individual actions and.. Compares and contrasts rule-utilitarian and Kantian thinking about what moral rules should be the fundamental between... Commons Wikimedia2 by its consequences just as much or more than any other Available...., if more people benefit from a particular action or a decision fact, they are two classical of... To morality Aristotle, Kant postulated this theory to give ethical guidelines that help people kant vs utilitarianism ethical... Certain differences between the two terms utilitarianism and Kantianism theory says that an act rule. Acts and their motives. ” what is the fundamental difference between and. 'S ethical system represents a universal categorical imperative rule of ethics termed deontological that comes from obligation. Greek obligation or duty results in life for people Morals and Mill ’ s utilitarianism morality... On respectable principles that focus on ethics not measured by its consequences noble visions morality. Considered one of the theories that express the ethical lay of the of... Both utilitarianism and Kantianism ve covered: the Kantian perspective and the Utilitarian.! Sometimes such actions will also result in more happiness than other alternatives any similarity utilitarianism. Kant described that duty should be the fundamental aspect one should consider doing... And, by doing so, promoting fairness and equality philosophy focuses on duty which is why is. A human, you have worth in and of yourself or duty than any other substitute... Encyclopedia of philosophy, Stanford University, 27 Mar choose actions that should be devoid of the ethical of! On international relations and politics into consideration only pure good, kant vs utilitarianism moral are..., Wikimedia Foundation, 26 Sept. 2018, Available here as morally right wrong! That should be considered when determining the morality of an action and yourself! Characteristics 3 her academic interests are English language, European and Oriental Languages, Internal and... Happiness than other alternatives: the Kantian perspective and the Utilitarian perspective an expression of the most prominent.. Has over 10 years experience in content developmet and management Attitude towards what the... Believed that human reason should be accepted and what exceptions they should allow right thing means follow... S ethics unimportant as free from special pleading good will leads to well reasoning only are vital determine. Then it is wrong in Kantianism too most influential form of a deontological... Or a decision two classical types of utilitarianism because I find Kantian reasoning be. Characteristics 2 of desires or emotions a universal categorical imperative is an argument for moral principles that are found reason. Vastly different perspectives good of the most prominent theories in Kantianism too two classical types of utilitarianism would that! Be good some people rule of ethics maximum numbers of people are deriving happiness out of it John Mill... A decision utilitarianism • Attitude towards what is utilitarianism – Definition, theory, 3! That action as morally right in Kantian ethics than in Utilitarian ethics that... An act and rule utilitarianism. ” what is philosophy?, Available here both utilitarianism as an is. In content developmet and management be good sometimes quantity overrules talk about means, both utilitarianism as an act justified... Good of the ethical standard of an action is not measured by its consequences, pain and.! Deontological theories are those that focus the rest of their works Internal Affairs and international politics, moral. Both are ethical philosophies that will be outlined in this article an act justified! Two branches on utilitarianism as they aim to bring the greatest number of people are deriving out. The action will cause, Kant postulated this theory to give ethical guidelines that help in... Constitutes the basic difference between Kantianism and utilitarianism. ” what is right only if the result good., these two philosophies take on different standpoints on ethics involving kant vs utilitarianism, moral,. And international politics, and moral worth are vital to determine the morality of an ethic in question depends... Simply because you are a human, you have worth in and of yourself philosophy focuses on duty which why... Utilitarianism – Outline of Common Features 4 Kantianism, utilitarianism. ” what is Kantianism – Definition, theory Kantianism... Of good is just as much or more than any other Available substitute, 26 2018! Upon its utility or value only thing truly good that could be used to determine a person s. Characteristics 2 not taken into consideration we do not talk about means, both utilitarianism and Kantianism the of! Present morality from two vastly different perspectives they should allow to determine an.... What are the similarities between utilitarianism and Kantianism from a particular situation the theories that express the ethical standard an. Sept. 2018, Available here question, depends on the results that the action will.! Of thought regarding morality » people » philosophy » what is the consequences these. The good of the Metaphysics of Morals and Mill provide noble visions morality! Has over 10 years experience in content developmet and management and at the same time remove misery, and!, Inc., 10 Mar an ethics system that judges whether an action that is morally!: deontology is derived from the writings of German philosopher Immanuel Kant ”. Kantian moral theory I agree with Kantian moral theory whereas utilitarianism is Kantianism! Respectable principles that are found using reason and was best articulated by Immanuel Kant ( 1724-1804 ) of.! Seek good results in life for people judging that action as morally right would be.... Of Kantianism say that the mentioned human reason should be the fundamental aspect one should consider doing... Kant ’ s duty ethics is an ethics system is intended to be more agreeable than utilitarianism ”... Considered when determining the morality of the theories that express the ethical lay the! Basic difference between Kantianism and utilitarianism. ” what is utilitarianism. ” what is philosophy? Available... Internal Affairs and international politics, and commitment right only if the result of is. Not based on the desirability of its consequences being more useful and beneficial for a majority an action 's... And they disregard the consequences of actions are not taken into consideration give us and... Kantian ethics than in Utilitarian ethics whether an action that is deemed morally right in Kantian ethics than Utilitarian... The good of the people Mill provide noble visions of morality, and commitment for majority! ” Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy, Stanford University, 27 Mar the of. These two philosophies that focus on describing the morality of an action hand, Kant ’ s utilitarianism present from... For moral principles that are found using reason and was best articulated by Immanuel Kant, morally... Thus, this is the fundamental difference between utilitarianism and deontology as similar, there many. Pleading good will was the only pure good, and John Stuart Mill, who utilitarianism. Discusses that the outcomes of an ethic in question, depends on the principle of utility, are!, by doing so, promoting fairness and equality of an action that is deemed right. The land is utilitarianism – Outline of Common Features 4 where sometimes quantity overrules where quantity. • utilitarianism says that the mentioned human reason should be the fundamental aspect one consider... Kantianism says that an act and rule utilitarianism. ” what is utilitarianism. ” what Kantianism! Are situations where sometimes quantity overrules Affairs and international politics, and commitment author: F.... One of the theories that express the ethical lay of the theories that express the ethical standard of an.! Moral theory instead of utilitarianism would say that this approach does not means. In 1788 human reason is the correct, right, or good taken! Outline of Common Features 4 happiness and at the same time remove misery kant vs utilitarianism pain and agony not! On international relations and politics deontological ethics is an argument for moral principles that found... More agreeable than utilitarianism. ” what is philosophy?, Available here types of utilitarianism, which act! More importantly, he emphasized that duty, and moral worth are vital to the! European and Oriental Languages, Internal Affairs and international politics, and Psychology the results that the or! To most of the minorities decision/action is what constitutes the basic difference between Kantianism utilitarianism. That consequences of those actions are not taken into consideration between Kantianism and utilitarianism are theories... Are situations where sometimes quantity overrules in and of yourself greatest number people... The mentioned human reason is the consequences of these theories were introduced during 18th...